[SpecialTopics 691] Re: "numeracy" vs. "mathematical literacy"Dave Tout davet at cae.edu.auTue Sep 18 22:33:12 EDT 2007
Hi David and all, A brief response re the numeracy vs math terminology. I agree learners often only use and know the term math (or "maths" down under) and in some of our curriculum frameworks we specifically call our stream "numeracy AND mathematics". Which some people find a bit unusual. Cheers Dave ______________________________________________________ Dave Tout, Manager, Educational Quality and Compliance, CAE NEW Phone: + 61 3 9657 8118 Fax: + 61 3 9657 8155 Mobile: 0418 526 586 Address: Level 3, 267 Collins St., Melbourne Postal address: CAE, 253 Flinders Lane, Melbourne VIC 3000 ______________________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: specialtopics-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:specialtopics-bounces at nifl.gov] On Behalf Of David J. Rosen Sent: 19 September 2007 10:58 AM To: specialtopics at nifl.gov Subject: [SpecialTopics 687] Re: "numeracy" vs. "mathematical literacy" Lynda, Mary Jane and Myrna, Let's look at this question from the perspective of potential adult learners. I have talked to graduates from adult literacy programs -- adult learner leaders -- who object to the term "literacy" because, they said, they could read just fine. They needed help, they said, with math. They complained that the terms "literacy", or "reading", as a name for a program (e.g. "The Literacy Project" "the Adult Reading Program" and similar names) obscures that the program offers numeracy ("math" as students call this) . One woman said she went for years without getting help because she didn't know adult basic math classes existed in her town, and the program that could help her was just a few blocks away from where she lived! So although there may be good reasons for using "numeracy" among practitioners, let's hope that "math" appears alongside in the program promotional materials so adult learners can find the services they need. I am reminded of a discussion that I was in recently about what to name a new corporate online workplace ESOL program. One of the seasoned teachers in the room said, it doesn't really matter as long as the name begins with "English" because that's what the students will call it, "English class". And we all agreed. I have some more questions about the study: 7. On Page 27, you write: "The mathematical demands of today's technological society are different from those of earlier decades. Some concepts have become more important for coping with the demands while others are not as critical as they once were." What are the concepts that are not as important now, and what concepts are more important now? (And thanks, Tom Macdonald, for raising the observations about the relationships of learning technology to learning numeracy.) 8. As I read the descriptions of "problem solving" on pages 34-35, the process resonates with a process that I believe is used by some visual artists. A sculptor, for example, has to "organize the information from the creative problem into a form or model that enables the artist to "see" the underlying structure of the problem. To do that, often sculptors make drawings, look for patterns, and make models. Has there been research on mathematical or numeracy problem solving and artistic problem solving and how these thinking processes might effectively be integrated and strengthen each other in K-12 schools or adult learning programs? (Thanks, Susan Kidd, for raising the issue of the relationship of numeracy to the arts.) 9. At the end of the paper you write about the importance of a "productive disposition" that is, learners having beliefs in their ability to do numeracy and in its usefulness to them, and having positive feelings about numeracy. Is this, the affective part of this component, more important than the other components? Does it need to be addressed first, or is it addressed through a teaching and learning process that weaves together all components equally? Can this weaving process take place for learners who have very negative feelings about their ability to do numeracy? David J. Rosen Apecial Topics Discussion Leader djrosen at comcast.net On Sep 18, 2007, at 8:30 PM, Lynda Ginsburg wrote: > Hi everyone, including the far flung ones! > > To me, I'm also not sure there's a meaningful difference between > "numeracy" and "mathematical literacy" because we can really define > them > as we like. > > But, I see an important political issue here in the US in regards > to the > terminology. A while back there was a policy document called something > like "From the margins to the mainstream." The primary focus of the > policy > document was literacy, and there was a sentence stating something > to the > effect that math was subsumed under "literacy." (The Adult Numeracy > Network actually responded to this document protesting this limited > view > of mathematical learning.) > > By talking about "mathematical literacy" within the adult basic ed > environment, we are using the "L word" and thus continuing to relegate > math/numeracy instruction and learning to a second tier level, > subsumed > under the literacy umbrella. Since the field here has historically > been so > focused on literacy, there has been limited attention to and > recognition > that teaching and learning math is really very different from > teaching and > learning reading/writing. > > Those of you from other countries have somehow managed to elevate > "numeracy" to a relatively equal status with literacy. We couldn't > convince COABE to title their new journal "Adult Literacy and > Numeracy," > tho the Aussies have one with both words in the title. > > So, I vote for the term Numeracy rather than Mathematical Literacy. > > I guess this counts as a rant. > > Best, > Lynda > > -- > Lynda Ginsburg > Senior Research Associate, MetroMath > Rutgers University > tel: 732-445-1409 > ------------------------------- ------------------------------- National Institute for Literacy Special Topics mailing list SpecialTopics at nifl.gov To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/SpecialTopics Email delivered to davet at cae.edu.au -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- New experiences. New opportunities. www.cae.edu.au -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS EMAIL NOTICE this message (and any attachments) may contain privileged and confidential information intended for the use only of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in relation to the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at the above address and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses.
More information about the SpecialTopics mailing list |