National Institute for Literacy
 

[SpecialTopics 681] Re: SpecialTopics Digest, Vol 14, Issue 30 Adult Numeracy

marty.lopinto at fuse.net marty.lopinto at fuse.net
Tue Sep 18 17:13:54 EDT 2007


You can also find them at
www.keypress.com
Marty Lopinto


--
Marty Lopinto

---- marty.lopinto at fuse.net wrote:

>

> I use the Empower Books also! Great hands on exploratory lessons.

> Go to www.peppercornbooks.com

> Good Luck

> They are worth spending the money on & they are reproducible!!!

> Marty Lopinto

> Great Oaks ABLE

> Cincinnati, Ohio

>

> --

> Marty Lopinto

>

> ---- kdowdy at austincc.edu wrote:

> > Hi Mari,

> >

> > I would love to know more about the TIAN materials. Are they books,

> > manipulatives, or a combination there of? Also how might you go about

> > ordering these materials?

> >

> > Thanks so much,

> > Kathy Dowdy

> > Austin Community College-Adult Education

> >

> > Mari John <mjohn at kats.tec.ks.us> said:

> >

> > > I started teaching from the TIAN materials (fractions, decimals and

> > percents book) and they're wonderful. One of my students said the visual

> > number line and the "half of a half" concept for understanding one-fourth of

> > a number has given her a new understanding of fractions. She's very bright

> > in reading and writing but has always struggled with math. Others have

> > also "religiously" used that number line to understand the concept of

> > breaking down a whole number into fractions. I taught from the data and

> > graph and algebra book last year. I heard similar comments: "They never

> > taught us this way when I was in school"!!

> > >

> > > Mari John

> > > Kansas

> > >

> > > -----Original Message-----

> > > From: specialtopics-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:specialtopics-

> > bounces at nifl.gov] On Behalf Of specialtopics-request at nifl.gov

> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:00 AM

> > > To: specialtopics at nifl.gov

> > > Subject: SpecialTopics Digest, Vol 14, Issue 30

> > >

> > > Send SpecialTopics mailing list submissions to

> > > specialtopics at nifl.gov

> > >

> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

> > > http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/specialtopics

> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

> > > specialtopics-request at nifl.gov

> > >

> > > You can reach the person managing the list at

> > > specialtopics-owner at nifl.gov

> > >

> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific

> > > than "Re: Contents of SpecialTopics digest..."

> > >

> > >

> > > Today's Topics:

> > >

> > > 1. [SpecialTopics 664] Re: Components of Numeracy/Manipulatives

> > > (Lynda Ginsburg)

> > > 2. [SpecialTopics 665] Components of Numeracy (David J. Rosen)

> > > 3. [SpecialTopics 666] Re: Numeracy-Children vs. Adult

> > > (Lynda Ginsburg)

> > > 4. [SpecialTopics 667] Re: International Discussion Ends and

> > > Numeracy Discussion Begins (Mary Jane Schmitt)

> > >

> > >

> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------

> > >

> > > Message: 1

> > > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:33:26 -0400 (EDT)

> > > From: "Lynda Ginsburg" <ginsburg at rci.rutgers.edu>

> > > Subject: [SpecialTopics 664] Re: Components of Numeracy/Manipulatives

> > > To: specialtopics at nifl.gov

> > > Message-ID:

> > > <1155.68.84.41.133.1190075606.squirrel at webmail.rci.rutgers.edu>

> > > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

> > >

> > > Hi all,

> > >

> > > I have used measuring tools, particularly rulers and tape measures, as

> > > "concrete manipulatives" to help learners "see" fractions and decimals

> > > (cm. rulers or tapes). The topic is ostensibly measurement, which

> > > virtually every adult has found useful and worthwhile, and the need for

> > > fractions or decimals is quite apparent. Equivalent fractions make sense

> > > on a ruler, as do adding and subtracting fractions.

> > >

> > > It has also been fun to have groups of learners design their ideal house

> > > or apartment, draw it on graph paper to scale, and then make scale models

> > > with cardboard. Lots of proportional reasoning, measurement, etc. People

> > > have even built small cardboard furniture and brought in toy cars for the

> > > driveway or street. Problem-based learning, collaboration, need to

> > > communicate mathematically, and lots of math issues arise.

> > >

> > >

> > > Lynda

> > >

> > > Mary Wooten wrote:

> > > > Manipulatives--

> > > >

> > > > I'm so glad someone is interested in manipulatives. We actively use

> > > > manipulatives in all our ABE/GED math classes to illustrate concrete and

> > > > abstract concepts, concretely for students. It is a way of illustrating

> > > > a concept. We have a wonderful response from students, in general.

> > > >

> > > > We use them both with small groups and individually.

> > > >

> > > > The key to acceptance with adults is modeling use of them and having

> > > > them out and available in the classroom as a rule of thumb, not an

> > > > exception. We like the rolling plastic drawers to store them in so we

> > > > can pull them around the room.

> > > >

> > > > We have obtained most of our manipulatives through the Summit Learning

> > > > Company. We have quite a few but ones we use most often are:

> > > > Multiplication Wraps- great for abstracting times tables, Clock to show

> > > > elapsed time, large cardboard Thermometer - for positive and negative

> > > > numbers; fraction tiles, dice, Pizza game- great for fractions with a

> > > > group, decimal/fraction/ percent dominoes.

> > > >

> > > > Teachers do need to be trained on these and encouraged to use them.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mary S. Wooten M.Ed.

> > > >

> > > > GED Coordinator

> > > >

> > > > Adult Basic Education

> > > >

> > > > Santa Fe Community College

> > > >

> > > > Santa Fe, NM 87508

> > > >

> > > > Phone (505) 428-1329

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -----Original Message-----

> > > > From: specialtopics-bounces at nifl.gov

> > > > [mailto:specialtopics-bounces at nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Kathie Daviau

> > > > Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 4:49 PM

> > > > To: specialtopics at nifl.gov

> > > > Subject: [SpecialTopics 652] Re: Components of Numeracy

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I am interested in the use of manipulatives in the adult ed math

> > > > classroom. How are manipulatives used? How do you introduce

> > > > manipulatives to adults? Do you use manipulatives in an individualized

> > > > setting? What are your favorite manipulatives?

> > > > Thanks,

> > > > Kathie

> > > > Billings, Montana

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -----Original Message-----

> > > > From: specialtopics-bounces at nifl.gov on behalf of David J. Rosen

> > > > Sent: Sun 9/16/2007 5:44 AM

> > > > To: specialtopics at nifl.gov

> > > > Subject: [SpecialTopics 649] Components of Numeracy

> > > >

> > > > Colleagues,

> > > >

> > > > Some of you have emailed me that you have been eagerly awaiting the

> > > > discussion on the components of numeracy study.

> > > >

> > > > To get full benefit from the discussion this week you will need to

> > > > prepare. It won't take long. You'll find links to the readings at:

> > > >

> > > > http://www.nifl.gov/lincs/discussions/specialtopics/07numeracy.html

> > > >

> > > > or the short Web address:

> > > >

> > > > http://tinyurl.com/yvo6hf

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > So far I have not received any questions from subscribers. Please

> > > > read the preparation documents and then e-malil your questions to me

> > > > or to the list today.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks,

> > > >

> > > > David J. Rosen

> > > > Special Topics Discussion Moderator

> > > > djrosen at comcast.net

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -------------------------------

> > > > National Institute for Literacy

> > > > Special Topics mailing list

> > > > SpecialTopics at nifl.gov

> > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to

> > > > http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/SpecialTopics

> > > > Email delivered to ginsburg at rci.rutgers.edu

> > >

> > >

> > > --

> > > Lynda Ginsburg

> > > Senior Research Associate, MetroMath

> > > Rutgers University

> > > tel: 732-445-1409

> > >

> > >

> > > ------------------------------

> > >

> > > Message: 2

> > > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:12:42 -0400

> > > From: "David J. Rosen" <djrosen at comcast.net>

> > > Subject: [SpecialTopics 665] Components of Numeracy

> > > To: specialtopics at nifl.gov

> > > Message-ID: <9EF504A9-BB0A-4873-A4D9-74B1EBE8D3FB at comcast.net>

> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes;

> > > format=flowed

> > >

> > > Colleagues,

> > >

> > > I do hope our guest authors might address the three questions I posed

> > > yesterday, and here are three more:

> > >

> > > 4. One difference, that you point out in the study on page 15,

> > > between how children and adults learn numeracy is ?The inclusion of

> > > societal contexts in adult-focused frameworks stands in marked

> > > contrast to the exclusion of such contexts in school-based

> > > frameworks.? Are there other differences?

> > >

> > > 5. I have been looking at some numeracy teaching/teacher training

> > > videos, for example:

> > >

> > > http://mlots.org (?Ratio and Proportion?)

> > > http://www.teachersnetwork.org/media/index.cfm (?Real Math?)

> > >

> > > Most of the videos I have found are focused on children; very few are

> > > focused on adults; but the approaches are similar: getting teachers

> > > comfortable in the language and use of numeracy thinking, organizing

> > > classrooms so students are actively engaged in discovery of numeracy

> > > concepts, and helping learners make those concepts and related skills

> > > their own. What do you see as the similarities between how children

> > > and adults ideally should learn numeracy?

> > >

> > > 6. On pages 16-17 of the study you describe a continuum of

> > > contextualization and give examples of two very different word

> > > problem learning activities, the opposite ends of the spectrum. The

> > > first is a decontextualized opportunity to practice some recently-

> > > taught skills ? an activity that is ?realistic?, not ?real?. The

> > > second grows from a real-life context where students do not have

> > > clues, other that the context of the problem itself, for what

> > > numeracy is needed. I wonder if you have other examples along the

> > > continuum that you could share.

> > >

> > > David J. Rosen

> > > Special Topics Discussion Moderator

> > > djrosen at comcast.net

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ------------------------------

> > >

> > > Message: 3

> > > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:19:38 -0400 (EDT)

> > > From: "Lynda Ginsburg" <ginsburg at rci.rutgers.edu>

> > > Subject: [SpecialTopics 666] Re: Numeracy-Children vs. Adult

> > > To: specialtopics at nifl.gov

> > > Message-ID:

> > > <1381.68.84.41.133.1190089178.squirrel at webmail.rci.rutgers.edu>

> > > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

> > >

> > > Hi David et al,

> > >

> > > I wanted to comment on some of the issues you raised about the differences

> > > between children's and adults' experiences learning math/numeracy. To me,

> > > one of the primary differences is the whole idea of learning math vs.

> > > learning numeracy.

> > >

> > > In school, children are generally learning math so that they can go on to

> > > and be successful in higher levels of math. Children are full time

> > > students; that's pretty much what they do. While there is an assumption

> > > that the math children learn will be available for other, everyday

> > > purposes, meeting those purposes (usually expected to be in the future) is

> > > not generally the goal of school. Thus, our statement about the exclusion

> > > of societal contexts in school math. I know that's a gross generalization,

> > > but I think it's often true. Just think about "word problems" that have

> > > sometimes been promoted as "real world applications." Word problems are

> > > virtually always contrived, pretty formulaic, and function as

> > > computational examples with words, and usually aren't very

> > > realistic/meaningful to the learner (When was the last time a teenager

> > > really needed to figure out when the two trains would meet? For that

> > > matter, when was the last time you needed to figure that out?). Most of us

> > > noticed pretty quickly that the word problems following the pages on

> > > multiplying fractions could all be solved by multiplying the fractions

> > > between the words.

> > >

> > > On the other hand, we have been thinking of "numeracy" as being integrally

> > > connected with real world activity, continuously crossing the

> > > school/everyday life chasm. Adult learners have one foot in the classroom

> > > and the other in the outside world. They bring that world into the

> > > classroom with their experiences, and they should be able to bring their

> > > classroom-based learning out to their real lives. Tasks and problems in

> > > real life are messy, call for judgements, estimations, and assumptions.

> > > Math becomes a tool, not an end in itself.

> > >

> > > Without getting into the whole "math wars" thing, the K-12 math reform

> > > movement has tried to shift the emphasis of school math learning from a

> > > focus on acquiring and mastering decontextualized computation skills to a

> > > focus on developing conceptual understanding. To me, this is a shift

> > > towards my vision of numeracy.

> > >

> > > Getting back to your question about the teacher training videos that show

> > > children exploring, talking about math concepts, struggling with making

> > > meaning of the math -- I agree these are similar to what I would like to

> > > see in adult ed classes. The few existing videos of adult ed math

> > > instruction are also in this vein (from the TIAN/EMPower projects, from

> > > NCAL's PDK, others?) Generally all these videos are from reform classes,

> > > often from National Science Foundation curriculum projects. I think these

> > > video tapes have been created from the need for teachers (K-12 & adult ed)

> > > to be able to see what a different kind of instruction might look like,

> > > especially since most teachers didn't experience this kind of schooling

> > > themselves. [I know that this was the rationale behind "Captured Wisdom"

> > > which focused on using technology in the classroom].

> > >

> > > That said, I am sure there are also some videos out there promoting rote

> > > learning of math facts, but we all already know what that looks like.

> > >

> > > Sorry to be rambling,

> > > Lynda

> > >

> > >

> > > David J. Rosen wrote:

> > > > Colleagues,

> > > >

> > > > I do hope our guest authors might address the three questions I posed

> > > > yesterday, and here are three more:

> > > >

> > > > 4. One difference, that you point out in the study on page 15,

> > > > between how children and adults learn numeracy is ?The inclusion of

> > > > societal contexts in adult-focused frameworks stands in marked

> > > > contrast to the exclusion of such contexts in school-based

> > > > frameworks.? Are there other differences?

> > > >

> > > > 5. I have been looking at some numeracy teaching/teacher training

> > > > videos, for example:

> > > >

> > > > http://mlots.org (?Ratio and Proportion?)

> > > > http://www.teachersnetwork.org/media/index.cfm (?Real Math?)

> > > >

> > > > Most of the videos I have found are focused on children; very few are

> > > > focused on adults; but the approaches are similar: getting teachers

> > > > comfortable in the language and use of numeracy thinking, organizing

> > > > classrooms so students are actively engaged in discovery of numeracy

> > > > concepts, and helping learners make those concepts and related skills

> > > > their own. What do you see as the similarities between how children

> > > > and adults ideally should learn numeracy?

> > > >

> > > > 6. On pages 16-17 of the study you describe a continuum of

> > > > contextualization and give examples of two very different word

> > > > problem learning activities, the opposite ends of the spectrum. The

> > > > first is a decontextualized opportunity to practice some recently-

> > > > taught skills ? an activity that is ?realistic?, not ?real?. The

> > > > second grows from a real-life context where students do not have

> > > > clues, other that the context of the problem itself, for what

> > > > numeracy is needed. I wonder if you have other examples along the

> > > > continuum that you could share.

> > > >

> > > > David J. Rosen

> > > > Special Topics Discussion Moderator

> > > > djrosen at comcast.net

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -------------------------------

> > > > National Institute for Literacy

> > > > Special Topics mailing list

> > > > SpecialTopics at nifl.gov

> > > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to

> > > > http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/SpecialTopics

> > > > Email delivered to ginsburg at rci.rutgers.edu

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > > --

> > > Lynda Ginsburg

> > > Senior Research Associate, MetroMath

> > > Rutgers University

> > > tel: 732-445-1409

> > >

> > >

> > > ------------------------------

> > >

> > > Message: 4

> > > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:38:23 -0400

> > > From: Mary Jane Schmitt <mary_jane_schmitt at terc.edu>

> > > Subject: [SpecialTopics 667] Re: International Discussion Ends and

> > > Numeracy Discussion Begins

> > > To: specialtopics at nifl.gov

> > > Message-ID:

> > > <OFABA13AAA.8B1914E3-ON8525735A.003D7D31-

> > 8525735A.00456EAD at terc.edu>

> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

> > >

> > > Hi Louise

> > >

> > > Yes, current versions of spell-check reject the word numeracy, even though

> > > its usage is becoming more common. When we used it in our papers, we

> > > generally meant adult numeracy. Early childhood numeracy* is different

> > > because numeracy does depend upon context - and age can be thought of as a

> > > contextual and a cognitive factor. The math appropriate for a 3-year old

> > > to learn, understand, and be able to do is different for an adult. On the

> > > other hand, all age groups are included when being numerate is defined as

> > > having `the ability and inclination to use mathematics effectively in our

> > > lives--at home, at work, and in the community' (New Zealand Ministry of

> > > Education, 2001).

> > >

> > > As far as far as the relationship among mathematics, literacy, and

> > > numeracy, some use a Venn diagram to illustrate numeracy as the

> > > intersection of mathematics and literacy - that might be a better analogy

> > > than a bridge between math and literacy. In fact, we see the term

> > > "mathematical literacy" to be synonymous with numeracy.

> > >

> > > * An aside, as we meant to focus on adult numeracy during this discussion:

> > > There is a rich body of research on early numeracy development, even in

> > > infants. I am fascinated by studies that have shown 6-month olds to be

> > > aware of subtraction errors (as evidenced by extended gaze), or the idea

> > > that babies can subitize, (recognize small quantities without counting) .

> > > Australia and New Zealand have early numeracy educational initiatives that

> > > are very interesting. I think Dave Tout and I stand corrected on the K-12

> > > designation for "school math before reaching adulthood." Even though many

> > > of the documents we referred to focused on K-12, we could have included

> > > pre-K.

> > >

> > > Take care,

> > > Mary Jane

> > >

> > >

> > > Mary Jane Schmitt

> > > TERC

> > > 2067 Massachusetts Avenue

> > > Cambridge, MA 02140

> > > mary_jane_schmitt at terc.edu

> > > www.adultnumeracy at terc.edu

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Louise Wiener <lwiener at llfinc.org>

> > > Sent by: specialtopics-bounces at nifl.gov

> > > 09/17/07 10:02 PM

> > > Please respond to

> > > specialtopics at nifl.gov

> > >

> > >

> > > To

> > > <specialtopics at nifl.gov>

> > > cc

> > >

> > > Subject

> > > [SpecialTopics 663] Re: International Discussion Ends and Numeracy

> > > Discussion Begins

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear David,

> > >

> > > I found the Tout and Schmitt chapter particularly invigorating and

> > > challenging and hope Dr. Schmitt might comment on two thoughts for

> > > starters.

> > >

> > > I was surprised at the frequent reference to K-12 with almost no reference

> > > to pre-K. I first became familiar with the term numeracy in the context

> > > of Head Start standards. Is there research on numeracy in the early

> > > childhood field ? or has the name alone been adopted?

> > >

> > > I was struck, too, by the reference to numeracy as the bridge between

> > > mathematics and the real world. I see it equally as the bridge between

> > > mathematics and literacy because it captures (builds on?) the language

> > > and concepts of math as contrasted with the pure computation of math.

> > >

> > > You will note that at least my spell-check rejects ?numeracy? as a valid

> > > word. Perhaps we should start by lobbying there!

> > >

> > > Thank you, Louise

> > > --

> > > Louise W. Wiener, Chairman of the Board

> > > Learning and Leadership in Families

> > > 2701 12th Street NE

> > > Washington, DC 20018

> > >

> > > Mobile Phone: 301-213-6516

> > > Office Phone: 202-243-7783

> > > Website: www.LLFinc.org

> > > Email: lwiener at LLFinc.org

> > >

> > > United Way / CFC # 8981

> > >

> > >

> > > On 9/15/07 8:10 AM, "David J. Rosen" <djrosen at comcast.net> wrote:

> > >

> > > Special Topics Colleagues,

> > >

> > > I want to thank our guests for the topic: What International Literacy

> > > Programs Offer Programs in the U.S. : Brenda Bell, Pamela Civins, Dr. John

> > > Comings, Barbara Garner, Dr. Erik Jacobson, Juliet Merrifield, and Dr.

> > > Ujwala Samant. I know we have only scratched the surfaces of several

> > > issues here in this one short week, but the discussion has been

> > > tantalizing. I also want to thank Oxfam for making the book Developing

> > > Adult Literacy: Approaches to planning, implementing and delivering

> > > literacy initiatives by Juliet Merrifield Juliet McCaffrey, and Juliet

> > > Millican available by download free for this discussion. It will be

> > > available in hard copy on September 30, 2007.

> > >

> > > This marks the end of the international literacy discussion, for now at

> > > least.

> > >

> > > On Monday we will begin a new discussion on The Components of Numeracy

> > > with Mary Jane Schmitt, Myrna Manly and Dr. Lynda Ginsburg, an occasional

> > > paper published by the National Center for the Study of Adult Learning

> > > and Literacy.

> > >

> > > For more information, and a short list of readings to prepare for the

> > > discussion please go to:

> > >

> > > http://www.nifl.gov/lincs/discussions/specialtopics/07numeracy.html

> > >

> > > or the short Web address:

> > >

> > > http://tinyurl.com/yvo6hf

> > >

> > > Please e-mail your questions for our numeracy guest experts

> > > to specialtopics at nifl.gov

> > >

> > > Your colleagues who may wish to join this discussion can subscribe

> > > by going to:

> > >

> > > http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/specialtopics

> > >

> > > After they complete a simple registration form (30 seconds) they

> > > will receive an email asking them to confirm that they wish to

> > > subscribe. They should Immediately reply to the email to complete their

> > > subscription. After the discussion ends they can unsubscribe from the same

> > > Web address, or stay on for the next discussion.

> > >

> > > David J. Rosen

> > > Special Topics Discussion Moderator

> > > djrosen at comcast.net

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > -------------------------------

> > > National Institute for Literacy

> > > Special Topics mailing list

> > > SpecialTopics at nifl.gov

> > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to

> > > http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/SpecialTopics

> > > Email delivered to lwiener at llfinc.org

> > > -------------------------------

> > > National Institute for Literacy

> > > Special Topics mailing list

> > > SpecialTopics at nifl.gov

> > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to

> > > http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/SpecialTopics

> > > Email delivered to mary_jane_schmitt at terc.edu

> > >

> > > -------------- next part --------------

> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

> > > URL:

> > http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/specialtopics/attachments/20070918/38d9f40b/att

> > achment-0001.html

> > >

> > > ------------------------------

> > >

> > > -------------------------------

> > > National Institute for Literacy

> > > Special Topics mailing list

> > > SpecialTopics at nifl.gov

> > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to

> > http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/SpecialTopics

> > >

> > > End of SpecialTopics Digest, Vol 14, Issue 30

> > > *********************************************

> > > -------------------------------

> > > National Institute for Literacy

> > > Special Topics mailing list

> > > SpecialTopics at nifl.gov

> > > To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to

> > http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/SpecialTopics

> > > Email delivered to kdowdy at austincc.edu

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> > --

> >

> >

> >

> > -------------------------------

> > National Institute for Literacy

> > Special Topics mailing list

> > SpecialTopics at nifl.gov

> > To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/SpecialTopics

> > Email delivered to marty.lopinto at fuse.net

>

> -------------------------------

> National Institute for Literacy

> Special Topics mailing list

> SpecialTopics at nifl.gov

> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/SpecialTopics

> Email delivered to marty.lopinto at fuse.net





More information about the SpecialTopics mailing list