[ProfessionalDevelopment 2540] Re: The "Decoding" of words, sentences, and paragraphsWayne Hall bw_hall at yahoo.comThu Sep 25 23:06:54 EDT 2008
Dear Mr. Sticht, Thanks for your post to the discussion forum, your study was a very interesting read! Cheers, Wayne Hall LG Electronics Learning Center Gumi, Korea --- On Fri, 9/26/08, tsticht at znet.com <tsticht at znet.com> wrote: From: tsticht at znet.com <tsticht at znet.com> Subject: [ProfessionalDevelopment 2537] The "Decoding" of words, sentences, and paragraphs To: learningdisabilities at nifl.gov, englishlanguage at nifl.gov, assessment at nifl.gov, professionaldevelopment at nifl.gov Date: Friday, September 26, 2008, 4:45 AM September 25, 2008 The “Decoding” of Words, Sentences, and Paragraphs Tom Sticht International Consultant in Adult Education Much discussion of teaching using alphabetics (phonemics; phonics) aims at learning to decode written words. Of course, this is necessary for reading. But beyond the word are the sentence and paragraph. Fluent reading may depend to some extent on how well people can construct sentences and compile them into paragraphs. The question arises, do more skilled readers develop a greater ability to construct sentences and compile them into paragraphs? Ordinarily word, sentence, and paragraph construction are aided by the use of spaces between words. Sentences are marked by punctuation (capitals; periods, etc.), and paragraphs are separated by spaces and sometimes indentation of the first sentence in the paragraph. But how well can low and high ability readers identify words, sentences, and paragraphs when there is no spacing or punctuation to mark beginnings and ends of these aspects of written language? To find out, in an exploratory study colleagues and I worked with 16 low reading young adults with reading skills from 3.5 to 7.7 grade levels, and an average score of 5.5 grade level reading. We also worked with 18 college students as high ability readers. We prepared four paragraphs of writing by typing all the words running together, the sentences running together, and paragraphs running together with no spaces or punctuation. We then asked the adults to go through the materials and place a line between each word, a dot over each line that separated sentences, and an x through the dots that separated each paragraph. We found that on average the high ability readers accurately identified 99 percent of words accurately, sentences with 77 percent accuracy, and paragraphs with 88 percent accuracy. For the low ability readers words were identified with 77 percent accuracy, sentences with 12 percent accuracy, and paragraphs with 19 percent accuracy. This raises the possibility that in reading normal texts, low ability readers may not achieve higher fluency skills in part because of a weakness in sentence meaning construction and paragraph meaning compiling skills. Possibly alphabetics may provide effective word recognition while whole language teaching may foster the development of sentence and paragraph construction and compilation abilities. These are aspects of “decoding” written language that I have not seen given attention in reading research, with either children or adults. Thomas G. Sticht, Email tsticht at aznet.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/professionaldevelopment/attachments/20080925/b3db91f5/attachment.html
More information about the ProfessionalDevelopment mailing list |