
Programs & Projects
The Institute is a catalyst for advancing a comprehensive national literacy agenda.
[Assessment 1108] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!
Jackie Coelho
jackie.coelho at gmail.comTue Feb 5 13:06:09 EST 2008
- Previous message: [Assessment 1108] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!
- Next message: [Assessment 1109] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Tina,
This has been researched already and is the basis for the arguement in
favor of bilingual education, a good idea that was not implemented in
the best way. For many years people have known that a good foundation
in literacy in the first language will facilitate learning in a second
or third language.
Another interesting twist is the existence of languages that are not written.
Jackie
On 2/5/08, Tina_Luffman at yc.edu <Tina_Luffman at yc.edu> wrote:
> Hi list members,
>
> My experience teaching ELAA students in the GED class is similar to that of
> Gail. If the student has a solid educational background in the country they
> came from in their native language, they tend to advance rather quickly and
> get their GED. Those coming with 6th grade educations from their country or
> lower tend to stay in the GED class for years and do not make much
> advancement.
>
> This experience relates well to research done among Native American tribes
> teaching them English. Those Native Americans who were first taught literacy
> skills in their own tongue learned English much quicker than those who tried
> to learn literacy skills in English without that background in their own
> tongue. I also found similar problems when I was learning Spanish. The
> concepts I could mentally translate from English to Spanish were much easier
> to grasp and learn than those I didn't know in English. Perhaps this is
> something deserving more research.
>
> Tina
> Tina Luffman
> Coordinator, Developmental Education
> Verde Valley Campus
> 928-634-6544
> tina_luffman at yc.edu
>
> -----assessment-bounces at nifl.gov wrote: -----
>
> To: "The Assessment Discussion List" <assessment at nifl.gov>
> From: "Gail Burnett" <gburnett at sanford.org>
> Sent by: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov
> Date: 02/04/2008 06:34PM
> Subject: [Assessment 1104] {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or
> Comments?!
>
>
> Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed
> Warning: (not named).
> Warning: Please read the "AttachmentWarning.txt" attachment(s) for more
> information.
>
> In our small adult education program, my experience (just about three years)
> is that students with solid educational backgrounds advance, particularly if
> they're not working too many hours. Those who advance the slowest, if at
> all, are immigrants who are barely literate in their first language. I would
> say that lack of education is a bigger factor than lack of time; a student
> who works full-time and is exhausted often will still succeed because he/she
> is familiar with academic work, and is goal-oriented. What we do is try to
> get our low-level students to come up with goals, but that's a hard concept
> in a second language.
>
> This does not mean that the factors mentioned in the research don't play a
> part, though. I'm one of those barely-trained teachers (transitioned from
> another career, got trained mainly through workshops rather than classes).
> My skill level very well may contribute to students' slow advancement. It's
> hard for small adult education programs to get highly skilled ESL teachers.
> The pay is low and there are no benefits. But my program is encouraging me
> to get extra training and has me on a plan of improvement. I think we're
> making some progress.
>
> Does this address any of the issues? And am I submitting it right?
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov on behalf of Marie Cora
> Sent: Mon 2/4/2008 6:50 PM
> To: Assessment at nifl.gov
> Subject: [Assessment 1103] No Questions or Comments?!
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm so surprised! No one has anything to comment on regarding your
> program's effectiveness at helping ESL students advance?? I was very
> curious to know if subscribers experience the same types of issues that Dr.
> Chisman and Dr. Crandall found in their research: a lack of intensity of
> instruction/few protocols for transitioning students/few opportunities for
> professional development.
>
> What are the issues in your program that you feel inhibit the ESL student
> from advancing? What do you try to do about that?
>
> Please post your questions and comments now.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Marie Cora
> Assessment Discussion List Moderator
>
>
> Marie Cora
> marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com
> <mailto:marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com>
> NIFL Assessment Discussion List Moderator
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment
>
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
> -------------------------------
> National Institute for Literacy
> Assessment mailing list
> Assessment at nifl.gov
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment
> Email delivered to tina_luffman at yc.edu
>
>
> -------------------------------
> National Institute for Literacy
> Assessment mailing list
> Assessment at nifl.gov
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment
> Email delivered to jackie.coelho at gmail.com
>
>
>
- Previous message: [Assessment 1108] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!
- Next message: [Assessment 1109] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Assessment discussion list



