[NIFL-4EFF:2914] more on fluency--Sticht

From: MWPotts2001@aol.com
Date: Fri Jan 14 2005 - 16:08:15 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j0EL8Fn04648; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:08:15 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:08:15 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <1c3.22832aa2.2f198d5c@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: MWPotts2001@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:2914] more on fluency--Sticht
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 1200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Status: O
Content-Length: 5553
Lines: 109

Fluency in Auding and Reading With  Adults         January 12,  2005

Tom Sticht
International Consultant in Adult Education

The  concept of "fluency" is presently enjoying a great deal of attention
as one  of "the essential components of reading" in U. S. federal
government  projects. For instance, the U. S. Education Department internet
web page for  Reading First states "Reading First will provide funds to
train teachers in  the essential components of reading (phonemic awareness,
phonics, fluency,  vocabulary, comprehension)…  ,"
http://www.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/applicant.html

However,  "fluency" is not actually a "component" of reading. Rather it is
the quality  of a reading performance. In reading it refers to reading that
is executed  without a lot of mistakes, not in a slow, halting, recursive
manner but  rather in a regular left to right, progressive moving, fairly
rapid (around  200-250 words per minute) manner when reading materials of
some  familiarity.

Similarly, listening to speech for comprehension,  technically known as
auding,  requires fluency in being able to decode  and track the spoken
message, an ability that most natural language learners  acquire with no
conscious effort. Generally, professional announcers on the  radio or
television, and readers for recording books for the blind, speak  aloud at
about 175 words per minute, plus or minus 25 words per minute  (1).

In 1973, the National Assessment of Educational Progress reported  silent
reading rates for 10th grade/college materials for adults 26 to 35  years
of age to be about 187 words per minute, with a range from 145 wpm at  the
25th percentile to 235 wpm at the 75th percentile (1, p.  95).

Speech specialists studying stuttering disorders have reported  that
typical adolescent or adult conversational speech rates are around 115  to
165 words per minute and reading rates of 150 to 190 words per minute  (2).

In all these instances, words per minute rates are used as  indicators of
fluency and, interestingly, they are quite similar for both  auding and
reading, suggesting that, once one becomes automatic at decoding  either
the spoken or the written language displays of information,  certain
languaging and comprehension processes may be limiting the rate at  which
either auding or reading for meaning takes place.

Language  processes such as lack of lexical (vocabulary) knowledge may slow
down the  fluency of auding or reading, as may the inability to construct
meaning  (comprehend) due to lack of relevant background knowledge or  other
factors.

>From a developmental perspective, children usually  develop fluency in
decoding, languaging and comprehension construction by  auding before they
develop fluency in these processes by reading. This  suggests that one goal
for fluency training in reading would be to have  students develop the
ability to read with the same fluency that they can  aud.

However, it is possible for adults with underdeveloped fluency in  reading
to still perform a large number of reading tasks with accuracy,  though
slowly. This is possible because unlike the temporally fleeting  spoken
message, the written message draws upon the properties of graphics and  is
more or less permanent. This means it can be studied at length by  readers
who are not fully fluent as defined above.

It is likely that a  great many adults who are declared "functionally
illiterate" using literacy  tests that present unfamiliar materials and
tasks are still able to function  by reading in their particular cultural
settings because speed of reading,  i.e., fluency,  is not a necessary
demand on them. Given sufficient  time, they may be able to study the types
of reading materials they need to  deal with and work their way through
them, even if these are fairly complex  materials.

The features of the graphic display of written materials,  which include
the more or less permanent nature of the display, (3) has made  it possible
for numerous adults who may suffer from dyslexia and lack fluency  in
reading to achieve many important literacy goals in academic,  home,
community and work settings.

Some research indicates that it may  take the typical child 6 to 8 years of
schooling to become as fluent by  reading as by auding (1, p. 82). So while
fluency in reading at 200-250 words  per minute is a useful goal for
instruction, it may not be achievable in  adult literacy programs where
adults usually participate for only 50 to 115  hours of instruction (4). In
this case, it is important to build  self-confidence and an understanding
of the reading process for adults so  that they can know how to continue to
develop their vocabulary and conceptual  knowledge by auding and by reading
after they leave the program, even if they  have to read slowly.


References

(1). Sticht, T. G. et. al  (1974). Auding and Reading: A Developmental
Model. Alexandria, VA: Human  Resources Research Office.

(2).See Special Education Speech Packet:  Fluency page 24  at
www.state.tn.us/education/speced/seassessment.htm

(3). (Sticht, T.  G. ( 2003). Teaching Reading With Adults. Online at
www.nald.ca under Full  Text Docuements.

(4). U. S. Department of Education. (2003). Adult  Education and Family
Literacy Program Year 2001-2002: Report to Congress on  State Performance.
Washington, DC: Office of Vocational and Adult  Education.


Thomas G. Sticht
International Consultant in Adult  Education
2062 Valley View Blvd.
El Cajon, CA 92019-2059
Tel/fax: (619)  444-9133
Email: tsticht at aznet.net  



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:20 EST