[NIFL-4EFF:2850] Re: another good article on balanced reading

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Mon Sep 27 2004 - 12:32:30 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i8RGWU813725; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:32:30 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:32:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <724AAB11.0E65F95E.0A349A3F@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:2850] Re: another good article on balanced reading
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Status: O
Content-Length: 504
Lines: 15

Meta,

I think I read the article last week.

Why do people go nuts on this issue?

Phonics is a subset of reading, learning how to read.  It is a skill, it is not reading per se.  Just like learning how to saw a board  is not bulding a house, it is a skill in same.

Severely disabled readers can't manage to put the sound with the  symbol;  other ways have to be found.

What people have to do is LEARN HOW TO THINK about this issue.  those caps are a shout, by the  way.

Thanks for the post.

Andrea



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:45:28 EST